Thursday, October 16, 2014

U.S- China Relations: The Conflict Between Two Powerful Nations

Since the emergence of the Mao’s communist state, China has been noted as an ever- growing threat to America’s economic and ideological superiority. The relationship between these two nations is one of the most important in the 21st century, particularly evident in economic and military correspondence between the two countries. Since the founding of the modern Chinese state (communistic), started by Mao in 1949, the relationship between China and the US has fluctuated between tense distrust and a lukewarm affiliate. The relationship was especially stressed during the Korean War and time of conflicts in Vietnam. Under Deng Xiaoping's pressure to embrace capitalism and open to the west, an economic connection was build between China and the US. Since then associations have improved, but even so, there are still conflicts between the two countries today. Cyber espionage, violations of human rights, and ideological differences are the prevalent tensions between China and the US today.
        We will begin our historical review of the Chinese-US relationship in the mid 1920s. China was entrenched in a horrendous civil war that split the country in two: communist vs. nationalists. Beginning in 1926, this conflict was bloody and ruthless. The communists, led by Mao Zedong, fought using guerrilla tactics and building off the support of peasants and farmers. The nationalists were backed by the United States. This is often cited as the beginning of hostile relationships between the Chinese communists and the US government. Following the Communist victory in 1950, the nationalist forces retreated to Taiwan and the US formally refused to recognize the authority of the communist government. Both during the Korean War and later in the Vietnam conflict, these two rival ideological camps butted heads. Beginning with Richard Nixon in the late 1960s, the US pursued a relatively better relationship with China. Since that time, Chinese and US economic activities have been heavily intertwined. While China offers a source of cheap labor and raw materials to American based companies, the US provides a large market for the Chinese to sell their goods. Most recently, there has been concern about the massive amount of Chinese debt the US has been accumulating--$1.2 billion in total.   
        The emergence of China on the world stage has had a number of implications for the future of international relations. Since the era of trade liberalization under Deng Xiaoping, China’s state led industrial might continue to grow at an unprecedented rate–and with it, the global economy becomes increasingly intertwined with China’s. Because China’s domestic goals of value-added, export driven growth rely so heavily on certain regions and their resources, they view their expanded role in international politics as necessary to their national interest. At the same time, political and economic friction have put China at odds with the Western sphere of influence and has prevented a consensus from being reached on a number of pertinent issues. While China believes this tension to be borne out of a Western desire to contain China, Western policy makers perceive it to be a rational reaction to China’s challenging of the longstanding world order. Conflicts as geographically diverse as those in Syria, Iran, Ukraine and North Korea are all greatly impacted by China’s foreign policy because of the intense impact China has on the rest of the world. Countries heavily rely on China to successfully supply them with both economic and political needs.  Both China and Russia’s support of the Kim and Assad regimes in the way of investment and arms have created a major counterweight to the US hegemony. The proliferation of Chinese made weapons throughout the Middle East and Africa–even in the face of UN sanctions–has fueled numerous sectarian conflicts in those regions. Similarly, Chinese bonds, rendering the sanctions counter-productive, may soon fill Russia’s capital void–left in the wake of US and European sanctions following Crimea–. China also holds a large degree of political leverage over the Western order because of it's permanent membership on the UN Security Council. In the past, they have used this power to veto resolutions that would have condemned the Assad regime and have also threatened to use it against sanctions on North Korea.
China and the US do not always butt heads, however. The willingness of China to cooperate on issues of economic and environmental importance such as the cutting of carbon emissions and bilateral trade agreements is a prime example. As a consequence of China's highly integrated economy, they realize that it is in their best interest to maintain good relations both with their neighbors and their trading partners (and vice versa). Hopefully this paradigm will be enough to keep China and the West from direct confrontation. Whatever the case, it is becoming increasingly apparent that these two superpowers cannot help but interact in the future. Whether these interactions will be negative or positive rests on the ability of both sides to compromise and respect one another’s cultural differences.






By: Kevin, Sophie, Luca, Imani, Corey, Miles






Citations:
-Grill, B. (1998, May 8). Meria. Retrieved October 17, 2014, from http://www.gloria-center.org/meria/1998/05/gates.pdf
-Haiyang, J. (2012, March 8). My turf my tariff. Retrieved October 17, 2014.
-Hachigian, N. (2014). Debating China: The US China relationship in ten conversations. New York, NY [u.a.: Oxford Univ. Press.
-Korby, B. (2014, June 19). Russia's $20 Billion Bond Void Filled by Nations From China to Mexico. Retrieved October 17, 2014.
-Lynch, C. (2006, July 13). China Vows to Veto North Korea Sanctions. Retrieved October 17, 2014.
-Sino-U.S. relations in pictures. (2008, July 11). Retrieved October 17, 2014, from http://www.china-embassy.org/eng/zt/xw/sinous/t532311.htm
-United Nations Security Council - Veto List. (2014, September 14). Retrieved October 17, 2014.
-U.S.-China Chronology - Issues - Countries - Office of the Historian. (2014, May 11). Retrieved October 17, 2014.
-U.S. Relations with China. (2012, September 20). Retrieved October 17, 2014.
-Lynch, C. (2012, August 15). China's Arms Exports Flooding Sub-Saharan Africa. Retrieved October 17, 2014.







Sunday, October 5, 2014

China Goes Ballistic: Asymmetrical Warfare and the New Arms Race

Chinese DF-21 Anti-Ship Missiles and Launchers
The arms race is today a term that is typically relegated to the bygone era of US-Soviet strategic relations. Now however, the US faces a new and more serious threat than Soviet nuclear warheads: Chinese anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs). Since the 1987 Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty between the US and Russia which called for the “destruction of...ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges of between 500 and 5,500 kilometers,” the Chinese have greatly improved their ballistic missile technology which now boasts greater range, accuracy, and firepower than their United States counterparts. In light of the US’ increased interest in the regional stability of what China considers to be its backyard, these developments are a major shift in the political-military landscape of Southeast Asia.
The strategic question of ASBMs really came up when the US Navy introduced its long term shipbuilding plan which includes two modernized supercarriers to add to its fleet of already ten. Given that a single Chinese YJ-12 cruise missiles launched from several thousand miles away could totally debilitate a multi-billion dollar aircraft carrier, the United States considers the PLA a legitimate threat to its armed forces. According to the Pentagon's latest annual report “the new missile provides an increased threat to naval assets, due to its long range and supersonic speeds.” The missile also ”has a range of 400 Kilometers, making it one of the longest-ranged ASCMs ever fielded.
In the past, the US has been able to use it’s overwhelming naval force to openly express opposition, most notably during the Taiwan Strait Crisis in 1995. This was also the case in Syria where the threat of naval based missile strikes forced president Assad to relinquish his chemical weapons stockpile. Strategically, the credibility of American threat is an invaluable tool in maintaining global peace. However, new and radical advancements in ballistic missile technology have put naval deployment forces at a significant disadvantage overall against land-based first strikes to which they would be unable to respond. This poses a direct threat to any American staging of operations in the Pacific–whether it be against North Korea, Russia, or any other governments supported by China.
The proliferation of advanced ASBMs–especially in the middle east where naval staging has played a key role in both Iraq wars–are of great concern now that the United States has commenced an airstrike campaign in Syria. Future naval operations in the Persian Gulf are at serious risk if these weapons proliferate to the regimes in Syria or Iran. “Blazing the Trail” as author Mike Gruntman describes it in his elaborate history of Dong Feng: Chinese Ballistic Missiles, shows that with its technological supremacy, China is steadily increasing its status as a significant international actor. With this increased role, China has forged its own international sphere–distinct from America’s–and have managed to attract a number of countries to their newfound bloc.
USS Nimitz 
China’s buildup of ballistic missiles is heavily rooted in the idea of Chinese nationalism. Falling back on the concepts of anti-imperialism and the Chinese right to defend itself, the Chinese media has acted openly hostile to the West and intimidated them with their ever increasing military ability. China’s state run news agency claims a type of "exclusive knowledge" in which the Chinese government knows how to defend its people absolutely. They raise moral by appealing to the identity of the Chinese people as one cohesive unit, when in reality China is a multiethnic state. By doing this, they are able to maintain their monopoly on legitimate violence and state persecution.
This rapid advancement of technology leaves the US uncertain about its future in the Pacific, a region its navy had virtually conquered by 1948. China and the US are struggling to meet an understanding on how to effectively co-exist in global politics, and the introduction of these anti-ship missiles only further complicates that.

#ChinaInTheWorld
Miles Bierylo, Corey Norell, Luca Difronzo, Sophie DeSantis, Kevin H., & Imani S.

Reference:

Kan, Shirley. China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues. New York: Nova Science, 2010. Web.

Lewis, Paul. "Obama Welcomes Syria Chemical Weapons Deal but Retains Strikes Option." The Guardian. N.p., 14 Sept. 2013. Web. 

"US Role." BBC News. BBC, 1996. Web. <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/asia_pac/04/taiwan_flashpoint/html/us_role.stm>.

Eaglen, Mackenzie. "The U.S. Navy Shipbuilding Plan: Assumptions and Associated Risks to National Security."Http://armedservices.house.gov/. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=62543f0c-4607-44c3-adfa-84d094f4b29f>.

Thompson, Mark. "In China’s Sights A New Missile Threatens the U.S. Navy’s Biggest Warships—and Stability in the Pacific." Time.com. Time Magazine, 18 July 2014. Web.

O'Rourke, Ronald. "China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress." Http://fas.org/. N.p., 8 Sept. 2014. Web. <http://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33153.pdf>.

The Endless Conflict: War in Gaza
By: Assala Mami, Bree Zamora, Jaleesa Alangan, Kirsten Saldana, Laura Eletel, Melissa Mata, Randy Cruzet
(Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons)


When speaking of the conflict between Israel and Palestine, there is no particular event that can be “blamed” as the sole reason for the conflict (Kumar, 2014). The issues that Palestine and Israel have been facing are religious, political, and territorial conflicts and have been present since the late 19th and early 20th centuries (History of Israeli-Palestinian conflict, 2014). In more recent news, the kidnapping and murder of three Israeli teenagers (explained below) sparked a new flame in the continuously growing fire between the two sides. As the world may already know, this incident instigated a 50 day war in Gaza that has sadly ended the lives of many and ruined the lives of many more (Dearden, 2014). Israeli police have raided Palestinian homes, their military has led air strikes that have killed a large number of Palestinians, many being civilians, and Palestinian retaliations have killed Israelis, although their numbers were not as great (Almasy, 2014). But more intricately speaking, it has brought up the question of “how can this conflict be resolved?” Unfortunately, the resolution resides in solving the crisis of who gets land and who doesn’t. On a domestic front, this conflict has Americans questioning whom our loyalty should reside with; Israel, our allies, or Palestine, the underdog?

As a whole, the Israeli - Palestinian conflict has a lot to do with the issue regarding identity politics. According to Annick T.R. Wibben identity politics is “inspired by the interests of, and intended to benefit, a particular group with a shared identity.” In this conflict there are two groups with both two different identities: one sharing a Jewish identity, which is Israel, and, a Muslim identity, which is Palestine. Both groups each have particular interests that benefit their own particular group and they intend to accomplish such an interest. Specifically in Gaza, Palestinian Arabs feel the right to be there since they have always been there, while the Jewish people feel they have right to take more land in order to have a homeland for Jews. With two groups having such opposite interests’ results into this major conflict between the two nations, this is one of the reasons why there is the war in Gaza between the Israelis and Hamas. To reiterate what Dennis Prager said the conflict boils down to “One side wants the other dead” (Prager University, 2014). Essentially, this whole conflict between Israel and Palestine has a lot to do with identity politics.

PHOTO: A map of Israel and its surrounding areas.With a population of about 1.8 million people, the Gaza strip is a 139 square miles piece of land, an area the size of Detroit, on the border of Egypt and against the Mediterranean Sea. Gaza is technically part of Palestinian authority, but it has been under the Hamas rule since 2007 (Palestine-Israel Conflict). The violence in Gaza sparked on June 12, 2014 when three teenage boys who were hitchhiking in the West Bank were kidnapped. On June 30, the bodies were found and Israel blamed Hamas for the kidnapping. Hamas denied such allegations from Israel, but Israel began to arrest, kill and raid the homes of the Palestinians. Over 300 Palestinians were arrested, 10 killed and approximately 1,000 private homes were raided just days after the bodies of the teenagers were found (ABC, 2014). However some Palestinians believe the tension between Gaza and Israel can date back to November 4, 2012, when a Palestinian man who strayed too near the Gaza-Israel border fence was shot and killed by Israeli soldiers. Although Israeli soldiers claim that warning shots were fired when the man did not follow orders to back away from the area. However Palestinian medics argue that the victim was unarmed and “mentally unfit”. According to an American-Israeli writer, Emily Hausen, the November 4 incident may have not been the only instigator as many rockets were being fired back and forth around that time. Hauser’s timeline of the major incidents that happened after November 4 can be viewed here (Khazan, 2012). There have been multiple efforts of creating a truce but both sides never agree, one of those efforts was during the first week of the crisis where a plan was proposed by Egypt. Israel accepted it but Hamas said it was not consulted and later on rejected it as "a surrender". Israeli leaders want Gaza to be demilitarized while Hamas will stop fighting when there is an end to the blockade to Gaza. A ceasefire, broken by the Egyptian government, was finally agreed upon on the 50th day of fighting (News, 2014).
The Gaza crisis has had a huge impact on Palestinian civilians. According to the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, of the 2,191 killed 1,660 were civilians. The number of wounded persons surpassed 10,000 (PCHR, 2014). The Gaza crisis also has had a negative effect on Israelis, which resulted in the killings of four civilians, one being a child (OCHA, 2014).  Many buildings and facilities were also damaged due to the airstrikes, including 71 mosques over the course of seven weeks (Agence France-Presse, 2014). The United Nations Office for the Coordination of the Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) states that “around 13 percent of the housing stock in Gaza was destroyed or damaged and over 100,000 become homeless”. More than half a million were displaced and due to the extreme damage that occurred, it left these people without access to infrastructure such as water, electricity, and the destruction of schools  (OCHA, 2014). A U.N. report in August claimed that Gaza may not be a "livable place" by 2020 because of food insecurity and abysmal infrastructure. The unemployment rate hovers near 30 percent (United Nations Centre, 2014).
         Despite the attacks made by Israel on Gaza that had the United Nations involved due to the lack of humanity shown to the Palestinians, the US was questioned whether Israel is causing a strain on this alliance. Obama’s current meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu talks about the United States’unbreakable bond between the United States and Israel” (Staff of Israel, 2014). President Obama wishes to help “change the status quo” between the Israel and Palestine by finally create a peaceful equality (Staff of Israel, 2014). The tense situation between Israel and Palestine has been an ongoing issue since the end of World War II when Israel became a state; but, it also took the home of millions of Palestinians. Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, thanked President Obama for "unequivocally affirming Israel's sovereign right to defend itself by itself against any threat"(BBC, 2013). The United States and Israel are more than allies; they hold a friendship that helps aid and protect Israel. Israel receives one of our biggest foreign aid  of one billion dollars annually from the United States (Mark, 2002). From 1996 to 2004, 74% of the aid was spent on purchasing US goods and services (Keinon, 2013). After 2004, due to the shift of global stability, our aid has changed as well. Not only are we helping with selling of US products but now we are aiding in military assistance. The US has helped with Israel’s economic competitiveness, the information technology revolution, resource sustainability, and public health (Eisenstadt, 2012).  Additionally, Israel is one of our few non-NATO allies which, according to the United States Nunn Amendment, means that they receive an additional military and financial benefits. Israel’s placement in the Middles East is a safe and protected location giving the justification for military aid from the United States.  As an ally, it helps the US strengthen presence in the Middle East thus gaining recognition asAmerica’s aircraft carrier in the Middle East” (News 2004).
In more recent news, the U.N. Security Council continues to draft resolutions that would grant Israel and Palestine their rights as two different states (Lederer, 2014) (Two-state solution, 2014).  The president of Palestine, Mahmoud Ababa, set the deadline for 2016 at the U.N. General Assembly meeting on Friday, September 27, giving the U.N. a year to construct rules for the state of Israel.  The resolutions would include the independence of Palestine as a state according to the borders set from the Mideast War of 1967 (Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica, 2014).  Both Israeli and Palestinian representatives have received a large majority of their support from the United States; because of what Obama describes as an “unbreakable” alliance with Israel, most Americans sympathize with the Israelis than with the Palestinians. At the same time, Democrats and Republicans do not necessarily disagree with any Palestinian actions.  This ongoing Palestine-Israel Conflict has the U.N. in agreement that the only way to create peace is to settle into two states, but the concerns shift towards the reality of actual peace for either nations -- together or apart.      


References
Keinon, H. (2013, January 3). US Senator Rand Paul set to visit Israel. US Senator Rand Paul set to visit Israel. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/US-Senator-Rand-Paul-set-to-visit-Israel
Lederer, E. (2014, October 1). Palestinians: Israeli Occupation Must End in 2016. ABC News. Retrieved October 6, 2014, from http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/palestinians-israeli-occupation-end-2016-25889953
ABC. (2014, July 31). Everything You Need to Know About the Israel-Gaza Conflict. ABC News. Retrieved October 3, 2014, from http://abcnews.go.com/International/israel-gaza-conflict/story?id=24552237
France-Presse. (2014, August 25). Gaza death toll increases as Israeli strikes continue. The Guardian. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2014/aug/26
Almasy, S. (2014, August 25). Israeli airstrikes kill 16 in Gaza, Palestinian officials say. CNN. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/24/world/meast/mideast-crisis/
News. (2004, January 28). Top Secret American Military Installations In Israel. Top Secret American Military Installations In Israel. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://www.jonathanpollard.org/2005/012805.htm
News. (2014, August 26). Gaza-Israel conflict: Is the fighting over?. BBC News. Retrieved October 3, 2014, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-28252155
BBC. (2013, March 20). Obama: US proud to be Israel ally. BBC News. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-21854164
Dearden, L. (n.d.). Israel-Gaza conflict: 50-day war by numbers. The Independent. Retrieved October 4, 2014, from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/israelgaza-conflict-50day-war-by-numbers-9693310.html
History of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. (n.d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Israeli%E2%80%93Palestinian_conflict
Khazan, O. (2012, November 17). Israel and Gaza violence: How did it start?. Washington Post. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/11/17/israel-and-gaza-violence-how-did-it-start/
Kumar, S. (2014, July 18). Why Is India Silent on the Israeli Operation in Gaza?. The Diplomat. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://thediplomat.com/2014/07/why-is-india-silent-on-the-israeli-operation-in-gaza/
Mark, C. (2002, October 17). Israeli-United States Relations. Israeli-United States Relations. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://www.policyalmanac.org/world/archive/crs_israeli-us_relations.shtml
Eisenstadt, M. M., & Pollock, D. (n.d.). Asset Test: How the United States Benefits from Its Alliance with Israel. - The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Retrieved October 2, 2014, from http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/asset-test-how-the-united-states-benefits-from-its-alliance-with-israel
OCHA. (2014, June-August). Humanitarian Bulletin Monthly Report. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affaris Occupied Palestinian Territory. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://www.ochaopt.org/documents/ocha_opt_the_humanitarian_monitor_2014_10_03_english.pdf
PCHR. (2014, September 16). Statistics: Victims of the Israeli Offensive on Gaza since 08 July 2014. Palestinian Center for Human Rights. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://www.pchrgaza.org/portal/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=10491:statistics-victims-of-the-israeli-offensive-on-gaza-since-08-july-2014&catid=145:in-focus
PragerUniversity. (2014, April 28). The Middle East Problem. YouTube. Retrieved October 6, 2014, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EDW88CBo-8
Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. (2014, July 24). Six-Day War (Middle East [1967]). Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/850855/Six-Day-War
Palestine-Israel Conflict. (n.d.). What is Hamas?. PalestineIsrael Conflict. Retrieved October 6, 2014, from http://palestineisraelconflict.wordpress.com/what-is-hamas/
of Israel Staff. (2014, October 1). Full text of Obama-Netanyahu joint White House statements. The Times of Israel. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://www.timesofisrael.com/full-text-of-obama-netanyahu-joint-white-house-statements/
Two-state solution. (2014, March 10). Wikipedia. Retrieved October 6, 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-state_solution
Nations Centre. (2014, July 16). United Nations News Centre. Israel agrees to ‘humanitarian pause’ in war-torn Gaza Strip, UN envoy confirms. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=48284#.VDIFdfldXkW
Wibben, A. (2014). Who do we think we are? In Global Politics: A New Introduction
(2nd ed., pp. 85-107). New York: Routledge.